Benjamin Hassan vs Panu Virtanen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
W L W W L L W L L LH2H: Hassan 1 - 0 Virtanen
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hassan winning 2 and Virtanen winning 0. The last match between Hassan and Virtanen was at the Tampere Challenger, 22-07-2019, First, Clay with Benjamin Hassan getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Benjamin Hassan | 1 |
| Panu Virtanen | 0 |
Tampere Challenger(22-07-2019)
7
6
6
1
| Hassan | Stats | Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| 48% (12-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 219 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 143 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 30 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 59% (319-221) | Career Total W/L | 48% (32-35) |
| $262,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-1 |
Stats 
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Panu Virtanen
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
28 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:14:28 | Average Match Time | 1:14:28 |
| 46% (23/50) | 1st Serve % | 40% (28/70) |
| 83% (19/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (17/28) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (16/42) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 53% (37/70) | Return Points Win % | 34% (17/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Ugo Blanchet
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Benjamin Hassan
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Ugo Blanchet
53%
(
64 of
120)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
45 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Felix Balshaw
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Panu Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Panu Virtanen
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
28 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Panu Virtanen
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panu Virtanen
Player
Nathan Seateun
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Panu Virtanen
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 4-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Bortolotti
Player
Panu Virtanen
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panu Virtanen
Player
Tom Fawcett
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (319/221) | Win/Loss | 48% (32/35) |
| 56% (724/559) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (72/79) |
| 52% (6344/5868) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (655/683) |
| 59% (59/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) |
| 62% (192/120) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (23/26) |
| 54% (66/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1875 | Aces Total | 14 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 1584 | Total Double Faults | 41 |
| 1:24:3 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 419.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 338.13 |
| 55% (18720/33732) | 1st Serve % | 60% (446/745) |
| 69% (12899/18720) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (258/446) |
| 51% (7583/15015) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (140/299) |
| 42% (1411/3376) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (26/56) |
| 40% (13432/33736) | Return Points Win % | 38% (263/699) |
| 38% (3/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68% (15/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (10/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (162/135) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 68% (125/60) | Futures W/L | 52% (32/30) |
| 59% (310/529) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (32/66) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (89/165) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 56% (114/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (10/18) |
| 86% (297/256) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (30/27) |
| 13% (297/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (30/3) |
| 25% (243/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (37/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
